Contact Supplier

Contact Supplier

To get in touch with C-realize IT Services SRL, simply fill out the form below.

    Subscribe to Supplier

    Subscribe to Supplier

    .

    CSV Initial Assessment

    products-servicesC-realize IT Services SRL
    December 13th 2024

    Computerized systems used in the development, manufacturing and throughout the lifecycle of biopharmaceutical products and medical devices need to be validated for GxP and other purposes.

    This is a complex procedure that is carried out in identifiable phases, described by C-realize in its blog pages (see Resources). The first of these steps is Initial Assessment, the foundation on which the success of the whole project rests.

    System Level Impact Assessment

    Initial Assessment itself consists of different phases, of which the first is assessing system-level impacts: understanding if and why the system in question needs to be validated and to what extent. The need for validation will depend on the system’s intended use, rather than its type. For example, a system used in preclinical research and development should be validated to meet good laboratory practice (GLP) standards. The same system used in commercial production would need to be validated to meet Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) guidelines, which are stricter and require more effort.

    The exercise will also determine if other regulations (e.g. SOX, HIPAA, GDPR) are applicable and need to be considered within the project.

    For complex systems, a component-level impact assessment can sometimes help to further distinguish high-impact components within the system that must be validated from the outset, as opposed to lower-impact aspects that can be part of a later ‘fine tuning‘ process.

    System Complexity

    Another factor determining the extent of validation is the complexity of the computerized system. While there are no precise guidelines here, the GAMP® forms a useful guide recognized by industry and regulatory authorities.

    It involves defining different categories each of which involves progressively higher levels of adaptation, configuration, customization, that bring with them ever higher levels of complexity, uncertainty, and therefore risk. These risk factors should be reflected in the level of detail in system design documentation and in the amount of testing required.

    Defining The Electronic Record(s)

    After assessing the system, the focus shifts to the data. For this exercise, companies often refer to the FDA’s 21 CFR Part 11 regulations. These cover “…records in electronic form that are created, modified, maintained, archived, retrieved, or transmitted, under any records requirements set forth in agency regulations…” and “…electronic records submitted to the agency under requirements of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Public Health Service Act, even if such records are not specifically identified in agency regulations”.

    Supplier Assessment

    Also known as Vendor Qualification, the Supplier Assessment determines the choice of whose products or services will form the basis of the validated.

    Supplier Assessment usually involves a balancing exercise, weighing up each company’s size, reputation, product functionalities offered and supported.

    The evaluation should reflect the impact and risks of using the system. The criteria for determination of the audit type should be clearly defined in a supplier assessment SOP.

    With the current pace of technological innovation, it also becomes more convenient for life science companies to outsource IT services and solutions to focus on their core businesses e.g. Software as a Service (SaaS). However, the greater the dependence on an outsourced supplier, the higher the stakes become in the Supplier Assessment to mitigate risks of the vendor failing to meet the quality and compliance standards demanded. The level of supplier audit should also be consistent with the complexity and criticality of the system to be validated and not the size of the supplier.

    Conclusions

    Many of the issues arising within a CSV project can be traced back to Initial Assessment. Often, some key stakeholders, especially Quality and Compliance professionals, are excluded from the planning of the project resulting in an inaccurate initial impact and scope determination. These issues usually arise later in the project and can slow down or block progress even more until everything is clarified for everyone and all documentation revised.

    Resources

    Click on Fundamentals of Computerized Systems Validation (CSV) Initial Assessments: Part 1 to read original blog article.
    Click on Fundamentals of Computerized Systems Validation (CSV) Initial Assessments: Part 2 to learn more.

    C-realize provide help and support for all your Pharma, Biotech and Medical Devices needs in software development, cloud computing services and regulatory compliance advice and solutions, to learn more please book in a Introductory Consultation Session.

    TRENDING ARTICLE

    5 Data Security Essentials for SaaS in GxP Environments



    FREE DOWNLOAD
    CSV Initial Assessment

    Computer System Validation requires careful planning and an effective Initial Assessment of risks and responsibilities.

    C-realize IT Services SRL

    Contact Information
    Address: Aleea Slanic 3A, Cluj-Napoca, ROMANIA
    Telephone No: +40 720 84 0518
    Email Address: [email protected]

    Contact C-realize IT Services SRL

    Simply fill out the form below to contact C-realize IT Services SRL now.

    Send C-realize IT Services SRL a Message